Your buyers now ask an AI before they ask you. This is what happens inside that answer, in plain English, and what you can and can't do about it. Read it before the report.
A buyer types a question the way they'd ask a colleague: "best organic mattress in Dubai", "which agency for a product launch", "is X better than Y for a family of four". The engine doesn't return a ranked list of links. It returns an answer with a handful of names in it, and the buyer treats those names as the shortlist.
The engine doesn't know your brand the way a person does. At the moment of the question it fetches pages, reads them, and builds the answer from what it read. What it reads most isn't brand websites. In the answers we measured, the most-cited sources were communities, video, social platforms and review sites: YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Trustpilot.
Two things follow. Your own site is one input among many, not the whole game. And you can't buy the placement: advertising is arriving next to AI answers, but the recommendation itself is assembled from sources, not sold.
Some buyer questions already have your name in them ("is [your brand] worth the price"). Most don't ("best organic mattress in Dubai"). Brands get named far more often on the first kind. The first number says people who already know you can find you. The second says strangers can. Only the second brings you anyone new.
Blend the two into one "AI visibility score" and the score is decided by the questions, not the brand. Add more questions with your name in them and it goes up. Nothing about you changed. So any number quoted to you should come with its question type attached, or it can't be compared to anything, including itself next month.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity read different sources and reach different verdicts. Ask all four the same question and, on the questions where at least one of them named the brand, 57% of the time they didn't all agree. Which engine your buyer happens to use decides whether you're in their shortlist. A check on one engine is one engine's opinion.
Measure a brand on 40 or more real buyer questions and, more often than not, it's named in fewer than one answer in four. In over a quarter of our 204 measurements the brand was named in fewer than one answer in ten. That's not a forecast for your brand. Your number is unknown until it's measured. It's the base rate, and the base rate is low.
The model behind each engine changes without notice. When we asked 245 identical questions before and after one engine changed its model, 26 answers gained a brand and 16 lost one. Nothing had changed on the brands' side. A number from one day is a snapshot. Without the engine, the model version and the date next to it, it can't be re-checked.
This is not a schema fix or an FAQ page. It's a standing discipline, and it has three parts.
It moves slower than paid and faster than brand. Source work compounds over months, and a model update can move a number either way without warning. There is no universal "good score"; there is your category's rate, your market's rate, and your own, measured the same way each time.
All of this measures what engines fetch and say today. What sits inside a model's training data is not visible to anyone outside the labs, and any vendor claiming to measure or change it directly is overpromising. Every figure above re-derives to a stored answer, an engine and a date. If a number can't do that, it isn't measurement.